The AHA today filed an in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, defending the Department of Health and Human Services’ decision to prevent drug companies from implementing a 340B rebate model. The brief was filed in a consolidated appeal involving five drug companies. The AHA said such models from drug companies would devastate hospitals financially.  

 

“In a world of finite resources, 340B hospitals will have no choice but to divert funds away from patient services and towards burdensome compliance,” the AHA wrote. “All of these consequences ‘frustrate’ the goal of the 340B statute.” 

Authored in-house by Chad Golder, AHA general counsel, the AHA was joined in the filing by the Children’s Hospital Association, the Association of American Medical Colleges and America’s Essential Hospitals.

Related News Articles

Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services today issued a notice announcing a 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program as a voluntary mechanism for qualifying drug…
Headline
Rep. Doris Matsui, D-Calif., and Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., today introduced the 340B Patients Act, AHA-supported legislation that would codify 340B providers'…
Headline
The AHA July 16 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado in defense of the state’s 340B contract pharmacy law prohibiting…
Headline
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri July 11 granted a motion by the state to dismiss claims by AbbVie that the state’s 340B contract…
Headline
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee June 30 denied a motion for a preliminary injunction by AbbVie in its lawsuit against the state’s…
Headline
The AHA June 27 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee that defends the state’s 340B contract pharmacy law…