
A federal judge in Idaho Aug. 24 preliminarily enjoined聽an Idaho law in circumstances where it would conflict with the requirements of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. The court concluded that the Idaho law lacks 鈥渁 cutout for EMTALA-required care,鈥 and thus 鈥渨ould inject tremendous uncertainty into precisely what care is required (and permitted) for pregnant patients who present in Medicare-funded emergency rooms with emergency medical conditions.鈥